Prestige Learning reveals how LSAT strategies from our live courses actually relate to the practice of law.
A lawyer’s approach to the logical reasoning “paradox” questions (sec. 2, ques. 25) and “principle” questions (sec 2, ques. 7 & 24).
...MOREA lawyer’s approach to the logical reasoning “method” questions (11 & 20) from Section 2 of the June 2007 LSAT, and a brief overview of “parallel” questions (question 12 from section 2).
...MOREA lawyer’s approach to the logical reasoning “flaw” questions (2, 4 & 21) from Section 2 of the June 2007 LSAT.
...MOREA lawyer’s approach to the logical reasoning “weaken” questions (5, 9, 14 & 17) from Section 2 of the June 2007 LSAT.
...MOREA lawyer’s approach to the logical reasoning “strengthen” questions (19, 2, 13 & 19) from Sections 2 & 3 of the June 2007 LSAT.
...MOREA lawyer’s approach to the logical reasoning “inference” questions (1, 3, 8 & 10) from Section 2 of the June 2007 LSAT.
...MOREA lawyer’s approach to the logical reasoning “assumption” questions (6, 13, 15 & 23) from Section 2 of the June 2007 LSAT.
...MOREA lawyer’s approach to logic games, specifically the second logic game on the June 2007 LSAT.
...MOREA lawyer’s approach to logic games, going back to the first logic game on the June 2007 LSAT.
...MOREA lawyer’s approach to logic games, continuing with the final logic game on the June 2007 LSAT.
...MORECopyright info:
All syndicated content presented here is property of the original publisher